Volltext: Zeitschrift für Ethnologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerkunde und der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 115.1990

     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
   
   
     
   
    
   
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
    
Rafael Wittek: Resource competition and violent conflict 
Johnson and Earle 1987), does not incorporate the crucial variables of the other two 
perspectives. None of them takes into consideration that different types of social orga- 
nization may solve the problem of scarcity in different ways. This one-dimensional 
point of view has still another consequence, as it obscures the fact that causal relation- 
ships may exist between the central variables of the different approaches. If this should 
be the case, statistical tests denying this fact may easily produce false correlations or 
may even be unable to unmask existing ones. 
Technically spoken, a distinction has to be drawn between (1) the causal relation- 
ships of the independent variables pertaining to the three approaches, and (2) the cau- 
sal effect these independent variables have on violent conflict. 
Causal relationships between the independent variables 
The central independent variables of the three approaches are population density, food 
Stress and social stratification (see Table 1). A bundle of hypotheses exists about the 
causal relationships between them, which will be briefly discussed below. 
Table 1. Independent variables 
SCCS Variable Quellen Source 
  
  
  
  
64 Population density 1 = 1 per 5 sqm 5 = 26-100 Murdock & Wilson 1972 
(persons per sqm) 2=1per1-5sqm 6 = 101-500 
3 = 1-5 7 = over 500 
4 = 1-25 
678 Food stress 1 = food constant Sanday 1981 
2 = occasional hunger 
3 = periodic or chronic hunger 
4 = starvation 
270 Class stratification 1 = absence among free men Murdock 1967 
2 = wealth distinctions 
3 = elite 
4 — dual (hereditary aristocracy) 
5 — complex (social classes) 
  
Population density and social stratification. Among evolutionary theorists it is a com- 
monly shared view that rising population densities lead to social stratification 
(Johnson and Earle 1987: 16-18; Dumond 1972; McNetting 1972: 235; Hammel and 
Howell 1987: 147). According to these studies, population growth, which is viewed to 
? an inherent trait of human und animal populations alike, causes population pres- 
Sure. Human societies face this situation by intensifying their production. This allows 
the generation of surplus, which is the basis of stratification. A positive relationship 
tween the two variables can be expected even if rising population densities are not 
Valid as a measure of scarcity, as suggested by some scholars.* According to a hypothe- 
ee 
* For à more lengthy discussion of this topic see Wittek 1990: 56-58. 
 
        

Nutzerhinweis

Sehr geehrte Benutzer,

aufgrund der aktuellen Entwicklungen in der Webtechnologie, die im Goobi viewer verwendet wird, unterstützt die Software den von Ihnen verwendeten Browser nicht mehr.

Bitte benutzen Sie einen der folgenden Browser, um diese Seite korrekt darstellen zu können.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.