Anthropos: Anthropos, 54.1959

Anthropos, 54.1959

Bibliographische Daten

Zeitschrift

Strukturtyp:: Zeitschrift

Werks-URN (URL):: https://digi.evifa.de/viewer/resolver?urn=urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-714789

URN:: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-714789

Persistenter Identifier:: BV041701500

Titel:: Anthropos

Untertitel:: internationale Zeitschrift für Völker- u. Sprachenkunde

Weitere Titel:: Anthropos

Erscheinungsort:: Fribourg

Verlag:: Ed. St. Paul, Anthropos-Institut

Erscheinungsjahr:: 1906

Sammlung:: Zeitschriften und Zeitungen > Zeitschriften zur Ethnologie

Wissensgebiet:: Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie > Allgemeines

Zeitschriftenband

Strukturtyp:: Zeitschriftenband

Werks-URN (URL):: https://digi.evifa.de/viewer/resolver?urn=urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-709680

URN:: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-709680

Persistenter Identifier:: DE-11-001896212

Titel:: Anthropos, 54.1959

Erscheinungsjahr:: 1959

Signatur:: LA 1118-54

Sammlung:: Zeitschriften und Zeitungen > Zeitschriften zur Ethnologie

Zeitschriftenheft

Strukturtyp:: Zeitschriftenheft

Titel:: Bd. 54, 1959, Heft 3, 4

Sammlung:: Zeitschriften und Zeitungen > Zeitschriften zur Ethnologie

Social Facts in Durkheim’s System By Pascual Gisbert Con Abstract Preliminary 1. Social Facts Their Definition Irreducibility to Individual Facts The Principle of Synthesis Influence on Individuals Morality, Law, and Religion Consequences Durkheim’s Hesitations 2. Interpretation Influences Principle of Actuality Principle of Creative Synthesis Group-Mind and Hypostasis ? Principle of Relating Analysis ents : 3. Criticism Analysis of the First Principle Its Invalidation Analysis of the Second Principle Social Facts, not Creative Synthesis Men as Components of Society Individuality as an Abstraction Social Facts as Human Facts “Society” as an Abstraction Social Facts Embodied in Objects The Whole Larger than the Parts ? Mental Processes and Physico-chemi cal Elements Morality, Religion, Knowledge, and the Sociologist Abstract. — Durkheim’s controverted doctrine of social facts, which are basic 111 his system, may be coherently understood in the light of the influence exerted on him W Wilhelm Wundt with his principles of actuality, creative synthesis, and relating an alysis — especially the two first. By way of criticism it is added that the principle of duality does not hold in its pure form, while that of creative synthesis was inaccurately a Pplied to social facts ; hence the Durkheimian subjection of the individual to society, ^he last part of the article contains a positive approach to the whole question. Preliminary The present article has been written in commemoration of the first Ce ntenary of the birth of Emile Durkheim (May 1858) whose influence in field of the social sciences is known to all. Though he was preeminently a sociologist, as he repeatedly professed, yet his writings and method made a deep impression on various anthropological theories one of which, the str uctural-functional school of social anthropologists, claims him as one of lts most illustrious forerunners. Anthropos 54. 1959 23

Zugriffsbeschränkung

Nutzungslizenz

fullscreen: Anthropos, 54.1959

Zeitschrift

Zeitschriftenband

Zeitschriftenheft

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Downloads

Ganzer Datensatz

Diese Seite

Bildfragment

Formate und Verlinkungen

Formate

Links

Zitieren

Ganzer Datensatz

Diese Seite

Zitierempfehlung