464
Mary W. Helms
Anthropos 1O1.200 6
understood by a populace whose Christianity was
strongly informed by earlier non-Christian person
ages, rites, and beliefs and who accepted the pres
ence of the marvelous on an everyday basis. 56 For
that matter, in the New Testament, the apocryphal
accounts, and the early church in general, Jesus
himself was regarded not just as a divinity but also
as a miracle-working magician and thaumaturge,
contributing to the rise, thorough entrenchment,
and prominence throughout the early Middle Ages
of “a Christian form of wonder.” 57
Joseph’s typological characteristics presumably
were also significantly influenced by the overall
Germanization of Christianity which eventually be
came normative (and especially influential as folk
religion) throughout much of early medieval Eu
rope (Russell 1994). Among other features, the
Germanic impact on Latin Catholicism fostered
not only a heavily magico-religious perspective but
also a heroic, power-oriented ethos and worldview
that emphasized human life, temporal powers, and
rewards in this world and respect for nature’s pow
erful and equivocal forces. Germanic Christian
ity also was greatly concerned with the historical
drama of Christ’s earthly life and focused on the
power of the Christ-God to effect this-worldly life
more than on eschatological concerns and soterio-
logical aspirations (Russell 1994: 6f., 17, 23,188f.;
Le Goff 1977: 173 f.). Orthodox Latin Christianity,
of course, had a different focus. In terms of Joseph-
related symbolism, as we have seen, the aspect of
Joseph’s smithing that appealed to patristic fathers
mainly involved the powerful metaphorical im
agery provided by metallurgy’s transformation by
fire wherein raw, imperfect earthly matter could be
changed into a new and purified substance of value,
analog for the overwhelming change that awaits the
faithful, who will ultimately be transformed and re
deemed from sinful physicality to cleansed spiritual
perfection and eventual eternal life.
In contrast, it seems reasonable to suggest that,
as a more worldly Germanic-Christian context de
veloped, the metaphorical emphasis of transforma
tion by fire would have shifted from the ultimate
56 Barb (1963: 107, 115, 123); Flint (1991): Boenig (2000);
Jones (1963; 18-20); Chaney (1967); Russell (1994).
57 Flint (1991:33); Smith (1978); Herren and Brown (2002:
160-165, 173 f.). “Good” magic (miracles or mysteries) was
understood to further the relationship between people and
the supernatural in positive terms that improved human life.
Magic to control weather, solve everyday problems, or ef
fect cures was acknowledged and sometimes even practiced
by Christian clergy, though many church spokesmen disap
proved (Barb 1963: 106f.; Hillgarth 1980:47; Flint 1991;
Eamon 1983: 181).
soteriological and eschatological perspective that
ends the process to greater concern with the raw
material that begins both the salvational and the
metallurgical transformational processes. In other
words, Germanic Christianity may have particu
larly emphasized the earthly (material) pole of the
matter - transformation - spirit continuum. If so,
Joseph as blacksmith would connote not only cre
ational Master of Fire but also chthonic Master of
Matter (Vries 1974:51), an interpretation in ac
cord, too, with long-standing Germanic and Ger
manic Christian interest in the supernatural pow
ers accorded material objects, such as the magical
swords, spears, helmets, etc. that legendary smiths
could craft (e.g., Russell 1994: 43).
If Joseph as a smith were to become particu
larly associated with the materiality of his craft,
it is easy to extend his general identification with
matter beyond occupation to later medieval themes
in which he is related to symbols referencing ma
teriality per se or appears as earthly Everyman bur
dened with humanity’s foibles, failures, and physi
cal weaknesses. 58 However, a connection with mat
ter is also strongly implied in some of the symbolic
meanings long accorded the raw materials with
which Joseph was always associated as a crafts
man: wood and iron.
Base Matter: Wood and Iron
To identify Joseph as a craftsman in some form of
hard material is to place him in company with all
the artisans, including smiths, heralded in Ecclesi
asticus as “maintain [ing] the fabric of the world’
(38.34). In the Near East, Mediterranean region,
and traditional Europe, wood and iron in particular
long maintained that fabric as raw materials essen
tial to human survival. 59 Wood was so fundamen
tal a substance that it signified matter in general
in the ancient world; the Greek word for “matter
(hyle; that which was given form in the universe)
was simply the word for wood or lumber 60 and
the Latin term materia (matter, material, stuff of
58 Possibly a somewhat parallel process may have encouraged
a change from an earlier identification of Joseph as mastei
builder or overseer, suggestive of God as a divine désigner
as in Ulfila’s Gothic translation of the gospels (see note 20),
to his later medieval portrayal as a domestically-orienteo
woodworker with modest in-home workshop. See, for ex
ample, Hahn (1986: 55); Stratton-Pruitt (2002: 33, 34, 43)-
59 Forbes (1958:14-22); Glacken (1967:318-325, 3361)’
Meiggs (1982).
60 Doresse (1960:80, n. 23); Bultmann (1956:128); Srnit
(1968: 639); see also Sambursky (1956).