Volltext: Zeitschrift für Ethnologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerkunde und der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 115.1990

Resource competition and violent conflict 
Cross-cultural evidence for a socio-ecological approach 
Rafael Wittek 
Lehrstuhl für Soziologie und Sozialanthropologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Findelgasse 9, D—8500 
Nürnberg 1, Deutschland 
Abstract. The present paper provides a statistical test of alternative theories related to the resource scarcity 
hypothesis in anthropological conflict research. Existing demographical, ecological, and evolutionary 
theories are criticized for conceptualizing scarcity as an one-dimensional phenomenon. An alternative “so- 
clo-ecological” model is developed, in which the distribution of scarce goods plays a key role. The power of 
the discussed models in explaining ten different forms of violent conflict management is examined by apply- 
Ing a hierarchical logit-analysis. The results provide strong support for the socio-ecological approach. 
Introduction 
The idea that scarce resources may be one factor leading to warfare or other forms of 
Violent conflict has been discussed for a long time in the social and political sciences 
alike. In cultural anthropology, this topic has attracted special attention with the rise 
Of the cultural-ecological paradigm in the 50's and 60's (Ferguson 1984). A great many 
of scholars began to focus on this relationship, and the majority of their rather detailed 
Case studies provide strong support for this argument.! Since then, some cross-cultural 
Work has followed, where these assumptions have been tested on a regional or world- 
Wide scale. Most of these studies arrived at a confirmation of the hypothesis, thus im- 
Plying that the connection between warfare and such phenomena as rising population 
densities or food stress can be accepted even as a statistical law. 
. Up to now, however, no attempt has been made to assess the theoretical compati- 
bility of the different approaches. Furthermore, the existing hypotheses have never 
een tested simultanously using the same sample. This will be done in the present 
Paper? I will start with a short review of existing cross-cultural studies dealing with re- 
Source scarcity as a cause of violent conflict. In trying to overcome some theoretical 
Weaknesses of previous attempts, a new theoretical perspective is developed in the sec- 
Ond section. It will be statistically tested against the previous explanations thereafter, 
using a hierarchical logit-analysis. 
SS ES 
1 
3 For an exhaustive bibliography on these studies see Ferguson and Farragher (1988). 
= r climinary versions have been presented atthe DFG-Conference “Theory construction and comparative 
Ee on violent conflict in Third World Countries: Nomothetic explanations versus ideographic des- 
Ptions” (Bonn, November 1989) and the annual meeting of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research (Cla- 
lemont, March 1990). 
  
Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 115 (1990) 23-44 
© 1992 Dietrich Reimer Verlag 
     
  
  
  
    
   
    
    
  
   
  
  
  
 
        

Nutzerhinweis

Sehr geehrte Benutzer,

aufgrund der aktuellen Entwicklungen in der Webtechnologie, die im Goobi viewer verwendet wird, unterstützt die Software den von Ihnen verwendeten Browser nicht mehr.

Bitte benutzen Sie einen der folgenden Browser, um diese Seite korrekt darstellen zu können.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.